In 2010, two senior ecologists wrote a thought-provoking paper about their experience of the scientific publication process. One of their aims was to generate discussion about the publication process, and that it did: it led to a follow-up piece by a group of eight early career researchers from six countries. In their paper, Schäfer and co (including qaecologist Jane Catford) comment on six key trends in publishing and suggest ways in which the process can be improved. Among the recommendations are increased impartiality and independence of the peer-review process through a move to double-blind review and use of quality control measures for reviewers and editors.
Search this site:
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- A carbon code of conduct is not enough September 4, 2014 qaecology
- Saving the most species at #uomOpenDay August 17, 2014 Michael McCarthy
- Socially-acceptable conservation planning: how can we integrate biological and social values to improve conservation? July 24, 2014 qaecology
- Qaecologists presenting at the International Statistical Ecology Conference, Montpellier 2014 June 23, 2014 qaecology
- Halting the spread of cane toads May 27, 2014 qaecology
- Our houses can’t make us all rich, via Warwick Smith bit.ly/1vPvEAQ 2 days ago
- My tribute to Gough Whitlam, via Warwick Smith bit.ly/1vLi5Cm 3 days ago
- Save time with ArcGIS and Python, via @Skiptoniam bit.ly/1rVq6OS 5 days ago