Quantifying levels of biological invasion: towards the objective classification of invaded and invasible ecosystems

Figure 1. The invasive aquatic plant Sagittaria platyphylla (delta arrowhead; Alismataceae) dominating a wetland along the River Murray, Australia. This is a good example of a site with low alien species richness but high alien species cover. Photo: J.A. Catford

Figure 1. The invasive aquatic plant Sagittaria platyphylla (delta arrowhead; Alismataceae) dominating a wetland along the River Murray, Australia. This is a good example of a site with low alien species richness but high alien species cover. Photo: J.A. Catford

Biological invasions are a global phenomenon that threatens biodiversity, and few, if any, ecosystems are free from alien species. The relative “success” of invasion is influenced by inherent features of the species (invasiveness) and recipient ecosystems (invasibility), and factors associated with human activities. Considerable effort has been made to define, characterize and identify species that are invasive, but much less attention has been devoted to quantifying and characterizing invasibility. In a recent paper published in Global Change Biology, qaecologists Jane Catford and Peter Vesk, along with colleagues Dave Richardson and Petr Pyšek, argue that a prerequisite for characterizing invasibility is the ability to compare levels of invasion across ecosystems.

Invasion level refers to the extent or severity of alien invasion observed in an ecosystem. A growing number of studies examine invasion levels among ecosystems and regions, but the metrics used are often not directly comparable (e.g. alien species richness vs. relative alien species cover). If two ecosystems are invaded by a different suite of species, how can management resources be prioritized objectively if the net impact of invasion on the ecosystems is unknown? If Ecosystem A has twice as many native species as alien species, but alien species make up half the total plant cover abundance, is it more severely invaded than Ecosystem B that has the same numbers of native and alien species, but where alien cover is only 25% of total cover? Identifying standard, comparable metrics will help with such decisions.

In the paper, the authors identify the best way to quantify the level of invasion by non-native animals and plants by reviewing the advantages and disadvantages of different metrics. They also explore how interpretation and choice of these measures can depend on the objective of a study or management intervention. Based on the review, they recommend two invasion indices: relative alien species richness and relative alien species abundance. When the relative cover of alien species exceeds relative alien richness (Fig. 1), this could be considered cause for concern.  The authors illustrate the use of these two metrics by applying them to two case studies (e.g., Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Level of invasion in 15 habitat types in the 13,340 km² Corangamite catchment in Victoria, Australia. Mean relative species cover is plotted against mean alien species richness (standard errors are shown). Data were gathered from 2717 vegetation plots (30 x 30 m) between 1972 and 2006 by the Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment; for description, see Catford et al. (2011).

Figure 2. Level of invasion in 15 habitat types in the 13,340 km² Corangamite catchment in Victoria, Australia. Mean relative species cover is plotted against mean alien species richness (standard errors are shown). Data were gathered from 2717 vegetation plots (30 x 30 m) between 1972 and 2006 by the Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment; for description, see Catford et al. (2011).

Establishing a standard metric of invasion is not only essential for determining invasibility, but has inherent value. Invasion level scores could be used to gauge the following:

  • the ecological consequences of invasion, e.g. biotic homogenization, competition with native species, alteration of ecosystem structure and disruption of ecosystem function, changes to biotic interactions and ecological networks like pollination and dispersal;
  • economic costs of invasion, e.g. loss of ecosystem services, reduced agricultural production, cost of control interventions; and
  • the potential for control, eradication and recovery post-invasion.

At the end of the paper, the authors briefly discuss how invasion level can be used to gauge invasibility by accounting for propagule pressure and invader traits. Establishing standard, transparent ways to define and quantify invasion level will facilitate meaningful comparisons among studies, ecosystem types and regions, and it provides a necessary step towards determining the invasibility of ecosystems.

For further details, email Jane Catford.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in News and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Quantifying levels of biological invasion: towards the objective classification of invaded and invasible ecosystems

  1. Pingback: New paper: Quantifying levels of biological invasion: towards the objective classification of invaded and invasible ecosystems | Jane Catford's Research

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s